Archive for the Category »science fiction «

skycaptain02 Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

When Paramount Pictures released the retro science-fiction adventure film, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, September of 2004, it had been much anticipated since June when it was first intended to hit theatres. Was the delay, due to director, Kerry Conran’s additional tweaking of this virtually total CGI movie, worth it? You bet your MAC IIci it was!

Sky Captain was a debut not only for its director. It was also the first motion picture done entirely with no sets, locations or props. The actors were real but everything from 1930-style city scapes to exploding zeppelins and flying robots were digitally rendered. “A lot of filmmakers would find it limiting, but I find it strangely liberating,” said Conran in an interview with Frank Rose in Wired Magazine. Actor, Gwyneth Paltrow, however had another take on working in the computerized blue-screen void: “You get a little nuts in that blue,” said Paltrow. “I started to feel like, if I ever see this color again, I’m going to kill myself.”

Conran had set out a decade ago to make a black anskycaptain03 Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrowd white movie set in the 1930s about a mad scientist and his robot army. When no studio offered the novice the $100 million to re-create the era, Conran turned to computer generated imagery to provide him his richly imagined world. This ironically gave Conran the liberty to create his imagined world just in the way he wanted, which included a clever mixture of obvious animation with sharp realism; multi-textured imagery, creations of realistic fantasy and the use of “brushing”, superimposed images, imaginative angles and muting in mostly sepia-toned settings. Packing every frame with a terraced layering of visual details rivalled only by Ridley Scott’s visual masterpieces (e.g., Bladerunner, Alien) Conran’s film is worth watching several times just to study the details within the rich expanse of its sweeping tapestries.

“Drawing from a well of pulp fiction, film noir and comic book imagery ? not to mention influences from the Wizard of Oz and Metropolis” (Allison Benedikt, Chicago Tribune), Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is a stylish and elegant film with a genuine mood and look of a 1930s motion picture. Gwyneth Paltrow plays Polly Perkins, a gutsy reporter who discovers that the world’s scientists are disappearing. After witnessing a giant robot invasion, in which Sky Captain, the mercenary hero-for-hire (Joe Sullivan, played by Jude Law), is called in to help fight, Polly seeks him out to help her solve the mystery. Undaunted by his sour reception, Polly strikes a bargain with Joe and they form a shaky alliance based on mutual distruskycaptain04 Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrowst and peppered with good wordplay.

Polly’s obsession over getting her front-page story ? and the ultimate photograph ? plays counterpoint with her vulnerable attraction to Joe. He is a much maligned mercenary with a just heart and a weak stomach beneath his tough bravado. We learn very soon into the story that the strong-willed nosy reporter shares a history with the legendary swashbuckling Sky Captain, and that they’d parted some time ago on rather ill, if not dubious, terms. Sky Captain’s cool bluster and nasty insults barely mask his weakness for the lady, making us wonder what happened between these two earlier to make their coffee bitter-sweet.

Polly and Joe’s search for a mysterious scientist, who formed a secret organization outside Berlin called Unit Eleven and thought to be behind the machine armies, leads them across the globe to exotic locales from the stormy Himalaya mountains of Nepal to Dr. Totenkopf’s tropical island in the middle of the Pacific.

Conran rendered his 1930’s mood with relentless consistency in everything from his authentic sets in sepia-tones to casting the most appropriate actors. The actors who played the principal characters looked like they’d come from that time period. Conran went so far as to resserect an actor from that era, the late Sir Laurence Olivier, to play Dr. Totenkopf (German for ‘dskycaptain05 Sky Captain and the World of Tomorroweadhead’). He achieved this by using CGI-manipulated archive footage of Olivier.

Conran keeps the actual plot fairly simple, which lets him ensnare the movie-watcher into his mesmorizing alternate universe. For instance, watching a zeppelin dock atop a New York sky scraper at night transported me to a place that might have existed but never did. It was like entering another dimension. When the flying robots first appeared in the New York evening sky, looking like one of my old alien-attack nightmares, I felt a kind of déjà vu with all the old 1950s SF movies. I kept feeling like I’d slipped through some crack between time into an alternate universe where all the inventions that didn’t take here actually worked. It was as though I was trapped in a dream where history had rewritten itself. This strangely enticing mixture of familiskycaptain01 Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrowar with the unfamiliar is a common device of retro-fiction, sometimes called “recursive fiction” that has become quite popular. Examples include, among many, Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy and Jasper Fforde’s Tuesday Next series. The recent film, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is another example.

I also didn’t mind Conran’s replete use of old SF clichés like a scientist’s Frankensteinesque laboratory, ray guns, metal-rivetted robots, or even a tongue-in-cheek reference to a come-on gesture made famous in the Matrix. The reason I didn’t mind was that he wasn’t just borrowing these, he integrated them into his retro fantasy and turned them on their sides. It also didn’t matter that some of the concepts didn’t make sense in the physics of our world. An example is the British Royal Navy’s mobile air strip. When Sky Captain’s shark-tooth painted plane runs out of gas over the middle of the ocean, he lands it on an incredible airborne landing strip run by Frankie (Angelina Jolie) of the Royal Navy, a no-nonsense girl of erect stature, sporting a patch ovskycaptain06 Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrower one eye, and who turns out to be Polly’s former rival for Joe’s affections.

From its first spectacular zeppelin scene to its last, Sky Captain races with non-stop action, punctuated only by frequent comic relief. The adrenalin surging airborn chase through the streets of New York city combined high tension with taught humor through characters’ witty banter ? something North American movie goers have come to expect in action movies. Paltrow’s and Law’s sometimes clever and amusing bickering lies much in the vein of legendary actors of that era such as Hepburn and Tracy or Bogart and Bacall and of a more current ‘scoundrel’ and his lady, Han Solo and Leia Organa in Star Wars.

Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow entertains in ways classic motion picture was intended since its inception. Conran delivers a full meal of action-adventure, spiced with a strong salsa of character repartee. The ending is spectacular, moving and humerous at the same time. A feat not easily achievable in films today.

Sky Captain has drawn incredibly mixed reviews, from: it “never exceeds the level of a clever exercise” (Carla Hall, San Francicso Chronicle) and has “no emotional centre” (Sarah Chauncey, Reel.com) to it is “a dazzling and groundbreaking film … the most fun you’ll have at the movies this year.” (Jeffrey Brunner, des Moines Register). This dichotomy of opinion is understandable because no film can be all things to all people. However, I strongly disagree with critics who pan Sky Captain as shallow and boring. I believe that this action-adventure delivers exactly what it was designed to deliver: a visually impressive and entertaining story.

Summing up both ends of the critical spectrum, Stephen Holden (The New York Times) says it best: “When Sky Captain remembers that storytelling and characters matter more than design and special effects, it charms as well as impresses.”

Well, it’s been out on DVD for a while, so go pick it up and tell me differently.
Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
  • services sprite Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

47umamoon2 Interesting Areas of Scientific Research

Recently, I was asked by JP Frantz at SF Signal to respond to an interesting question on their forum, “MIND MELD: Interesting Areas of Scientific Research”. The editors said,

“For many of us, one of the main interests of science fiction is it’s use of science as part of the story. There’s nothing quite like reading about a cool idea that is based on current scientific thought and then going back and finding out more. We asked our respondents this question:

Q: There is a lot of scientific research being performed across a wide array of disciplines. So much that it can be difficult to keep up with it all. What current avenue of scientific inquiry do you believe people should be paying attention to, and why?”

Head over there and read some thought provoking answers from the likes of Kathleen Ann Goonan, Nancy Kress, Mike Brotherton, Jennifer Ouellette, Kay Kenyon, and Alexis Glynn Latner.

Just to whet your appetite, here are some “clips” from a few examples of answers:

This one by Jennefer Ouellette interested me greatly: “My mantra is always, “Look to the fringes!” That is, those boundary areas between disciplines, where scientists from different fields are collaborating with each other and doing more interdisciplinary investigations. That’s where many exciting breakthroughs are likely to occur in the near future, I think. And with good alternative energy Interesting Areas of Scientific Researchreason: Science has become so highly specialized/compartmentalized that researchers often aren’t aware of breakthroughs in other fields that might have relevance to their own work. So any kind of cross-pollination is likely to lead to new insights or technologies, and, potentially, revolutionary breakthroughs…”(go here for more, like some examples she provides).

Kay Kenyon, always providing a great overview of humankind’s place in the world said this: “I wish we’d pay more attention to the Theory of Everything. I’m coming from the standpoint that basic research gets short shrift in the quest for marketable results. I read somewhere that we don’t understand photosynthesis at important levels of detail. Perhaps if we did understand photosynthesis we’d be on track for truly efficient solar panels. In the 19th century, realizing that electricity and magnetism could be understood as one combined force led to the harnessing of electricity, radio and that cell phone in your purse.

“So I’m just saying, let’s get back to basics. And what could be more basic than understanding the fundamental interactions in nature? (Electromagnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces and gravity.) I don’t pretend to understand the issues, but apparently we’ve still got a long slog ahead to fitting gravity into the general scheme of things. (Unless you’re an adherent of M-theory, and think string theory solves it. In case you care about an English major’s opinion, I agree with those who hold that string theory is suspect because it can’t be tested.)

alien landscapes Interesting Areas of Scientific Research“So let’s give a cheer for basic physics. And when we take an interest, perhaps our short-sighted electeds (Clinton era and beyond) will rue the day they canceled the superconducting Super Collider in Texas even after 14 miles of it had already been dug. The research continues at CERN at a smaller scale.”

Kathleen Ann Goonan provided a very interesting discussion on brain research and memory. Michael S. Brotherton talked about the Hubble Space Telescope and Alexis Glynn Latner described nanoscale science. Add your two cents worth and comment on the SF Signal post and/or leave a comment right here.

Bios:

Kathleen Ann Goonan is a science fiction writer with several Nebula Award nominated books. Her debut novel, Queen City Jazz was a New York Times Notable Book of the Year, and her most recent novel, In War Times, was chosen by the American Library Association as Best Science Fiction Novel for their 2008 reading list.

Nancy Kress is the author of 21 books of SF, fantasy, and writing advicenanotech04 Interesting Areas of Scientific Research. She has three more books appearing in 2008, a collection of short stories and two novels. Her fiction has won three Nebulas, a Hugo, a Sturgeon, and the John W. Campbell Memorial Award.

Mike Brotherton is the author of the hard science fiction novels Spider Star (2008) and Star Dragon (2003), the latter being a finalist for the Campbell award. He’s also a professor of astronomy at the University of Wyoming, Clarion West graduate, and founder of the Launch Pad Astronomy Workshop for Writers (www.launchpadworkshop.org). He blogs at www.mikebrotherton.com.

Jennifer Ouellette is the author of The Physics of the Buffyverse and Black Bodies and Quantum Cats. She also blogs at Cocktail Party Physics and Twisted Physics.

Kay Kenyon is a science fiction and fantasy writer currently living in Wenatchee, Washington. Her most recent novel, A World Too Near, has just been released, and continues the story begun in Bright of the Sky.

Alexis Glynn Latner‘s science fiction novel Hurricane Moon was published by Pyr in 2007. Twenty-three of her novelettes and short stories have been or will be published in science fiction magazines, especially Analog, and horror and mystery anthologies. She also does editing, teaches and coaches creative writing, and works in the Rice University Library.

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
  • services sprite Interesting Areas of Scientific Research
oryx%26crake Oryx & Crake  Book Review
Margaret Atwood’s Booker Award nominee, “Oryx and Crake” is a sharp-edged, dark contemplative essay on the premise of where the myopia of greed, power and obsession with “self-image” and its outstripping of ethics and morality may take us. Replete with sordid subject matter and unlikeable but complex characters, Atwood’s gloomy post-apocalyptic tale follows the slow pace of introspection. It is a dark commentary rich with vivid, often viscerally provokative language, metaphor and symbolism.

“Oryx and Crake” is a dark “cautionary tale for a society addicted to vanity, greed and self.” Often sordid and disturbing, it depicts “an acquisitional era where everything from sex to learning is about power and ownership” (Sarah Barnett, Anglican Media). In her typical sharp-witted prose and edgy humor, Atwood “uses those rare birds, oryx and crake, like canaries in the mines,” says Victoria Bramworth of the Baltimore Sun, “to invoke a metaphor ? and warning ? for our times”.

The story begins with Jimmy, aka Snowman (as in Abominable), who lives a somnolent, disconsolate life in a post-apocalyptic world created by a worldwide biological catastrophe. Slowly starving to death, Snowman’s mind leap frogs back and forth between his haunting memories of an abysmally amoral past to his present empty existence as the apparent sole survivor except for a group of naïve genetically-engineered youths. They are called the children of Crake, Crakers (after his best friend, who ? you guessed it ? created them) and they regard Snowman as their caretaker-prophet-demi-god. He spends a great deal of time wallowing in mourning for his beloved, Oryx, and best friend, Crake, as he searches for supplies in a wasteland where freakish genetically-engineered animals ravage the Pleeblands (where ordinary people used to live) and the Compounds (that used to shedarwinbookmarkbluestairs Oryx & Crake  Book Reviewlter the extraordinary). His journey back to Crake’s high-tech facility, where the genesis of the Paradice Project was conceived, is Snowman’s journey “home” to his past, which unfolds insidiously like a twisted version of Adam and Eve: And the Lord God commanded. . . “You must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.”(Book of Genesis). And there was much of that. Dying. Decaying. Suffering. It plays out like a warped tragedy written by a toked-up Shakespeare, with Crake as the self-proclaimed god and snake in one, Oryx his ill-fated Eve, and Jimmy a callow and ineffectual Adam. Jimmy more aptly fulfills the role of the court jester, the Fool (there always is one in a Shakespeare play and he often fulfills the role of commentator).

Atwood fittingly paints Jimmy this way. He is basically an unappealing jerk (like most Fools); a debauched, morally dubious individual whose “life and circumstances,” according to critic Sarah Barnett, “beg our sympathy but many readers may be reluctant to give it.” Yet, by the last third of the novel, I found myself indeed sympathizing with him, despite his shortcomings, which began to wither next to the soulless actions of his best friend. It is at the same time that I also noticed I was no longer “observing” the book but “participating” in it. Somewhere around page 280 (the book runs 378 pages) I began to get involved. Up until then the story was mostly an exercise in literary cleverness, sharp dark wit, and smartly turned phrases ? my reaction being: “Ah, that was clever, Margaret! I see your point, Margaret!” Never, “Oh, my God, what’s going to happen next?” My patience was vindicated in the last third of the book, however, when this cornucopia of documentary-style detail ironically provided me with a wealth of material to draw and feel pathos for Snowman’s cascading plight toward the book’s inevitable and tragic climax. What Sawyer inneffectively attempts with detail, Atwood consumately achieves: she cooly subverts the reader into accepting and viscerally experiencing her “mundane” world.

margaret atwood Oryx & Crake  Book Review

So, why did Jimmy incite my compassion? Perhaps it was the mother in me hoping he’d find his way, his connection with his soul and the heart of humanity. Even the mother who abandoned him (to pursue her principals) makes a last feeble effort to instill this in him in her final message to him: “I love you. Don’t let me down, Jimmy.”

Atwood’s astute command of the grim subject matter explored in “Oryx and Crake” provides an edgy realism that is not found in much traditional science fiction. I think this is largely due to Atwood’s mainstream literature background and to her virtuoso writing style (yes, including all that detail!). This is why it works, despite not being terribly original within a purely SF context. What Atwood brings to us that is more important than originality is her gritty realism and a tone of visceral immediacy. Oryx and Crake is a poignant commentary of our disfunctional society of isolated, fearful people who have lost touch with what it is to be human. She has accurately captured a growing zeitgeist that has lost the need for words like honor, integrity, compassion, humility, forgiveness, respect and love in its vocabulary. And she has projected this trend into an alarmingly probable future. This is subversive SF at its best.

Atwood’s “Oryx & Crake” is a swift left hook in the gut from the darkness; for those willing to spend time reflecting on the dark poetry of Atwood’s smart and edgy slice-of-life commentary, there is much to gain in reading “Oryx and Crake”.
Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review
  • services sprite Oryx & Crake  Book Review

neanderthal parallax01 Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review

Robert J. Sawyer’s tenth novel, Hugo award-winning “Hominids” jump-starts a thoughtful and imaginative trilogy, “The Neanderthal Parallax”, which explores an alternate evolutionary stream where Neanderthals became the dominant intelligent species on the planet. Sawyer makes up for less than vivid prose with well-researched paleoanthropological information and theoretical physics played out by charming untraditional characters from two parallel universes.

This SF trilogy published by Tor Books consists of “Hominids”, “Humans”, and the concluding, “Hybrids”, released in September, 2003 in hard cover. Hominids won the Hugo award for best SF. The remaining two have also run as Canadian Bestsellers and were nominated for Hugos.

The trilogy explores the lives and cultures of two unique species of people, Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalis, through the premise of existing parallel universes and what might happen if they “collided”. During a quantum-computing experiment, Ponter Boddit, a Neanderthal physicist, accidently pierces the barrier separating his universe from ours, plunging him into a land both familiar and strange. Having left behind his family, a mystery, and his colleague — accused of murder — Ponter’s search for home forces him to navigate his way robert+j+sawyer Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Reviewamong the curious and suspicious “Gliksins” who have in his world been extinct for 40,000 years. In our universe it is his kind who have been extinct for so long.

All three books move at a ponderous pace before finally accelerating into high gear. In “Humans” this only happens by chapter 17 (about a hundred pages into the book).

Certainly Sawyer’s characters radiate warmth and evoke our sympathy, but they remain avatars to the main driver of the trilogy, Sawyer’s imaginative ideas in science and social paradigms. While there is nothing new about the idea of parallel universes, Sawyer uses it ingeniously to launch his premise, of an alternate evolution where Neanderthals inherited the “big leap forward” into higher-consciousness, in order to explore an alternate zeitgiest and to comment on our own. The world of the Neanderthals unfurls before us through the counterpoint intrigue of their universe and our own. Sawyer’s alternative societal choices, illustrated through Neanderthal culture show us by example the foolishness of some of our own paradigms, social taboos and prejudices as he explores concepts of morality, gender, faith and love. Author David Brin says: “The biggest job of science fiction is to portray the Other. To help us imagine the strange and see the familiar in eerie new ways. Nobody explores this territory more boldly than Robert Sawyer.” One of Sawyer’s most ingenius concepts is a society wherein females live together with their same-sex mate apart from males who live with their same-sex mate and then get together with their opposite-sex mate only part of each month at the right time to conceive (or not). Of course this is feasible because when women live together for any length of time, it has been shown that they develop synchronus menstral cycles. I found Sawyer’s treatment oneanderthal parallax02 Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Reviewf this bisexual life-style sensitively and insightfully portrayed.

The writing in Neanderthal Parallax contains a fair bit of detail, such as the colour of someone’s phone or the brand of potato chips. For instance, do I need to know that Mary had “become quite taken with Upstate Dairy’s Extreme Chocolate Milk, which, like the Fabulous Heluva Good French Onion Dip, wasn’t available in Toronto”? There were also too many corny references for my taste to vernacular of our subculture, including “Star Trek” scenes. There are much more effective ways to illustrate a character’s predelictions than with cluneanderthal parallax03 Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Reviewtter of this sort. In the second book, “Humans”, Sawyer’s passing reference to the demise of New York’s Trade towers appears dropped in grauitously and, I found, trivialized the tragedy as a result. While this detail was no doubt intended to enrich his created world with a sense of concrete reality (not unlike many mainstream literery works) it also threw me, the reader, out of his “fictive dream” many a time. It detracted from the story’s compelling potential and slowed the pace considerably.
There are also times when Sawyer’s research overwhelms the story with expository information. For instance, when one of his characters is brutally attacked, permanently changing their physiology and consequently their mental behavior, instead of letting us witness the transformation in the character, we are presented with copious data from the character’s own research, as if Sawyer just had to include all the research he’d conducted on the subject. This invariably reads more like a travelog, a topography of life without its depth. Those times when he seamlessly infuses information in story stand out as a result. Two examples include the utterly fascinationg discourse between Louise Benoit and Jock Krieger about CEMI theory and the conversation between neuroscientist Veronica Shannon and Ponter and Mary about the relationship of religious experience with brain chemistry, both in the third book, “Hybrids.” Sawyer seems to do best with dialogue, and some of it is clever. One example comes to mind in a scene between Mary and her Neanderthal friend, Bandra, where Mary defends Homo sapien’s right to breed: “I guess we believe that superseding the brutality of natural selection is the hallmark of civilization.”

Sawyer’s “home-spun” style has its charm, providing us with some of that connection we yearn for through his characters. Sawyer’s main characters unfold with a realism that evokes strong empathy in the reader. I like his characters, pimples and all. I particularly like how he has tapped into his geographic heritage to give us full-bodied characters with uniquely Canadian backgrounds, like Louise Benoit, the statuesque French Canadian post-doc in quantum physics.

robert+j+sawyer2 Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review

Sawyer’s greatest skill as a fiction writer lies in how he marries his ordinary people in an ordinary world to extraordinary ideas and circumstance. And it is for this reason, I think, that he time and again arouses wide public readership and continues to be nominated for and to win Hugos and Nebulas. The Neanderthal Parallax is no different. I recommend this trilogy for not only Sawyer’s interesting thoughts on paleoanthropology and quantum theory but for the questions he raises about how we define our humanity. This is good classic SF.

Canadian literature is known for its contemplative introspection. It challenges us to think beyond ourselves and our “comfortable” world and poses a warning against complacency. Sawyer’s Neanderthal Parallax incites intellectual thought and lingers like a rich flavourful coffee.

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review
  • services sprite Robert J. Sawyers Neanderthal Parallax  Review

mars phoenix The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles

They came because they were afraid or unafraid, happy or unhappy. There was a reason for each man. They were coming to find something or get something, or to dig up something or bury something. They were coming with small dreams or big dreams or none at all—Ray Bradbury (The Martian Chronicles)

When I was but a sprite, and before I became an avid reader of books (I preferred comic books), I read Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles. It changed me, what I thought of books and what I felt about the power of stories. It made me cry. And perhaps that was when I truly decided to become a writer. I wanted to move people as Bradbury had moved me.

The Martian Chronicles isn’t really about Mars (though I’ve chosen to give it my Friday Feature placement as homage to the recent Phoenix landing on the red planet). True to Bradbury’s master metaphoric story-telling, the Martian Chronicles is about humanity. Who we are, what we are, and what we may become. What we inadvertently do—to others, and finally to ourselves—and how the irony of chance can change everything. mars02 The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles

It is, as the 1970 Bantam book jacket so aptly says, “a poetic fantasy about the colonization of Mars. The story of familiar people and familiar passions set against incredible beauties of a new world…A skillful blending of fancy and satire, terror and tenderness, wonder and contempt.”

An editorial review on Amazon.com sums up the tone of the book well: From “Rocket Summer” to “The Million-Year Picnic,” Ray Bradbury’s stories of the colonization of Mars form an eerie mesh of past and future. Written in the 1940s, the chronicles drip with nostalgic atmosphere–shady porches with tinkling pitchers of lemonade, grandfather clocks, chintz-covered sofas. But longing for this comfortable past proves dangerous in every way to Bradbury’s characters–the golden-eyed Martians as well as the humans. Starting in the far-flung future of 1999, expedition after expedition leaves Earth to investigate Mars. The Martians guard their mysteries well, but they are decimated by the diseases that arrive with the rockets. Colonists appear, most with ideas no more lofty than starting a hot-dog stand, and with no respect for the culture they’ve displaced.

Here are some excerpts. I hope they inspire you to read more of this evokative collection of short stories by a master storyteller and philosopher…it may change you…

~~~~~~~

martian chronicles The Phoenix Landing & The Martian ChroniclesRocket summer. The words passed among the people in the open, airing houses. Rocket summer. The warm desert air changing the frost patterns on the windows, erasing the art work. The skis and sleds suddenly useless. The snow, falling from the cold sky upon the town, turned to a hot rain before it touched the ground.

Rocket summer. People leaned from their dripping porches and watched the reddening sky.

The rocket lay on the launching field, blowing out pink clouds of fire and oven heat. The rocket stood in the cold winter morning, making summer with every breath of its mighty exhausts. The rocket made climates, and summer lay for a brief moment on the land…

~~~~~~~

They had a house of crystal pillars on the planet Mars by the edge of the empty sea, and every morning you could see Mrs. K eating the golden fruits that grew from the crystal walls, or cleaning the house with handfuls of magnet dust which, taking all dirt with it, blew away on the hot wind. Afternoons, when the fossil sea was warm and motionless, and the wine trees stood stiff in the yard…you could see Mr. K in his room, reading from a metal book with raised hieroglyphs over which he brushed his hand, as one might play a harp. And from the book, as his fingers stroked, a voice sang, a soft ancient voice, which told tales of when the sea was red steam on the shore and ancient men had carried clouds of metal insects and electric spiders into battle…

This morning Mrs. K stood between the pillars, listening to the desert sands heamartian landscape The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chroniclest, melt into yellow wax, and seemingly run on the horizon.

Something was going to happen.

She waited.

~~~~~~~

What follows is a profound and tender analysis of the quiet power humanity can wield unawares. What follows is a tragic tale that reflects only too well current world events where the best intended interventions can go awry. Ah, you’ve been there too… from the meddling friend who gossips to “help” another (only to make things worse) to the righteous “edifications” of a religious group imposing its “order” on the “chaos” of a “savage” peoples…to the inadvertent tragedy of simply and ignorantly being in the wrong place at the wrong time (e.g., the introduction of weeds, disease, etc. by colonizing “aliens” to the detriment of the native population; e.g., smallpox, AIDs, etc.). Bradbury is my favorite author for this reason (yes, and because he makes me cry…)

ray bradbury The Phoenix Landing & The Martian ChroniclesBiography of Ray Bradbury:
Ray Bradbury was born in Waukegan, Illinois, to a Swedish immigrant mother and a father who was a power and telephone lineman. His paternal grandfather and great-grandfather were newspaper publishers. Bradbury read and wrotr throughout his youth, spending much time in the Carnegie Library in Waukegan. He used this library as a setting for much of his novel Something Wicked This Way Comes, and depicted Waukegan as “Green Town” in some of his other semi-autobiographical novels — Dandelion Wine, Farewell Summer — as well as in many of his short stories. Bradbury graduated from the Los Angeles High School in 1938 but chose not to attend college. Instead, he sold newspapers at the corner of South Norton Avenue and Olympic Boulevard. He continued to educate himself at the local library, and, influenced by science fiction heroes like Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers, he began to publish science fiction stories in fanzines in 1938. A chance encounter in a Los Angeles bookstore with the British expatriate writer Christopher Isherwood gave Bradbury the opportunity to put The Martian Chronicles into the hands of a respected critic. Isherwood’s glowing review followed and substantially boosted Bradbury’s career. List of works by Ray Bradbury

Ray Bradbury’s Official Site: http://www.raybradbury.com/

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles
  • services sprite The Phoenix Landing & The Martian Chronicles